The Quantum Limit
Show explicit units, and run a sanity check on every result. A scaling answer is judged by its exponents, not its coefficient. Worked solutions are released after the homework due date.
Useful constants (CGS):
| Constant | Value |
|---|---|
| Natural mass scale | |
| Chandrasekhar mass | (so at ) |
Useful scalings from the reading: ; non-rel ; rel ; ; ; with .
Conceptual
Problem
⭐⭐ Cooling won’t save it. A student says: “A white dwarf just above the Chandrasekhar mass could be saved from collapse by cooling it down — colder means lower pressure demand, so it would stabilize.”
- (a) Identify the two physics errors (one about what degeneracy pressure depends on; one about what the limit depends on).
- (b) State correctly what the Chandrasekhar limit is about.
- (c) What would change the limit for a real white dwarf — name the one composition parameter.
Problem
⭐⭐ Three cores, three fates. Three stellar cores arrive at the end of fusion with masses , , and .
- (a) Predict the remnant of each and the pressure that (tries to) support it.
- (b) For each, name the physical reason that support succeeds or fails.
- (c) The boundaries near and are different kinds of wall. How does the wall differ in origin from the one?
Problem
⭐⭐ Why relativity is fatal. Non-relativistic degeneracy pressure () can always win against gravity, but relativistic degeneracy pressure () cannot.
- (a) Gravity’s pressure demand scales as (at fixed ). Explain why a supply always eventually overtakes it as you compress, but a supply does not.
- (b) In the relativistic case, what determines whether equilibrium exists, if not the radius?
- (c) Why is this a “hard wall” rather than a gradual weakening?
Calculation
Problem
⭐⭐ Build both pressure laws. Starting from and (pressure energy density):
- (a) For non-relativistic electrons (), derive the scaling (hence ).
- (b) For relativistic electrons (), derive (hence ).
- (c) State, from the exponents alone, why the relativistic gas is “softer.”
Problem
⭐⭐ An iron white dwarf. Using :
- (a) Confirm the carbon-oxygen value ().
- (b) Iron-56 has 26 electrons per 56 nucleons, so . Compute the Chandrasekhar mass of an iron white dwarf.
- (c) Is it larger or smaller than the C/O value? Explain physically why fewer electrons per nucleon lowers the limit.
Problem
⭐⭐ Classical or degenerate? Use to classify two gases.
- (a) Solar core: (ionized hydrogen, ), .
- (b) White-dwarf interior: (), .
- (c) Which is degenerate? Note that the two have similar temperatures — so what is doing the work in the ratio?
Synthesis
Problem
⭐⭐⭐ One scale, the floor and the ceiling. Three walls bound a star’s life: the minimum mass , the Chandrasekhar mass , and the maximum stellar mass .
- (a) Which of the three are built from the natural scale , and which is not?
- (b) Explain why and share but does not — in terms of which forces are in balance.
- (c) What is remarkable about the fact that both edges of degenerate stardom (the lightest star, the heaviest white dwarf) are written in the same four constants?
Problem
⭐⭐⭐ What Eddington couldn’t accept. Eddington accepted Chandrasekhar’s mathematics but rejected its conclusion.
- (a) State precisely what one is forced to believe exists if the Chandrasekhar limit is real and stellar cores can exceed it.
- (b) Explain the logical chain: limit is real massive cores have no white-dwarf endpoint what must happen to them?
- (c) Why does the existence of a maximum white-dwarf mass essentially force the existence of neutron stars and black holes?
Problem
⭐⭐⭐ A universe of bosons. Imagine electrons were bosons (no Pauli exclusion) instead of fermions.
- (a) What would happen to degeneracy pressure, and therefore to white dwarfs?
- (b) Would there still be a Chandrasekhar limit? Explain what “limit” even means in this universe.
- (c) Pauli exclusion also underlies everyday matter. Name one consequence for atoms or solid matter if electrons were bosons.