flowchart LR
subgraph observe["🔭 OBSERVABLES<br/><i>What we measure directly</i>"]
direction TB
O1["<b>Brightness</b><br/>How much light?"]
O2["<b>Position</b><br/>Where in the sky?"]
O3["<b>Wavelength</b><br/>What color/spectrum?"]
O4["<b>Timing</b><br/>How long? How often?"]
end
subgraph model["⚙️ PHYSICAL MODELS<br/><i>The physics that connects them</i>"]
direction TB
M1["Inverse-Square Law"]
M2["Kepler's Laws"]
M3["Wien's Law<br/>Stefan-Boltzmann"]
M4["Atomic Transitions<br/>Kirchhoff's Laws"]
M5["Doppler Effect"]
M6["Newton's Gravity"]
end
subgraph infer["💡 INFERENCES<br/><i>What we learn about the universe</i>"]
direction TB
I1["<b>Distances</b>"]
I2["<b>Orbital Properties</b>"]
I3["<b>Temperatures</b><br/>Luminosities"]
I4["<b>Chemical Compositions</b>"]
I5["<b>Radial Velocities</b>"]
I6["<b>Masses</b>"]
end
O1 --> M1 --> I1
O2 --> M2 --> I2
O3 --> M3 --> I3
O3 --> M4 --> I4
O3 --> M5 --> I5
O4 --> M6 --> I6
style observe fill:#e0f2fe,stroke:#0369a1,stroke-width:2px
style model fill:#fef3c7,stroke:#b45309,stroke-width:2px
style infer fill:#dcfce7,stroke:#15803d,stroke-width:2px
Module 1 Concept Map
How the Pieces Fit Together
How to Use These Maps
These diagrams visualize the connections you’ve built throughout Module 1. Use them to:
- Before studying: Get the big picture of how topics relate
- During review: Trace the logic from what we observe to what we learn
- Before the exam: Verify you understand each connection (not just each box)
Try covering part of a diagram and predicting what connects where. If you can trace the reasoning aloud, you understand the material.
The Observable → Model → Inference Framework
This is the course thesis: astronomers measure a few things directly and infer everything else.
Notice that wavelength connects to three different inferences (temperature, composition, velocity). This is why spectroscopy is the astronomer’s most powerful tool — a single spectrum encodes multiple properties simultaneously.
Module 1 Lecture Progression
Each lecture added a new capability to your toolkit. The arrows show dependencies — each topic builds on what came before.
flowchart TB
subgraph week1["<b>FOUNDATION</b><br/>Weeks 1-2: What Can We Observe?"]
direction LR
L1["<b>L1: Four Observables</b><br/>Course thesis"]
L2["<b>L2: Math Tools</b><br/>Unit conversion, ratios"]
L3["<b>L3: The Sky</b><br/>Coordinates, seasons"]
L4["<b>L4: Moon</b><br/>Phases, eclipses"]
end
subgraph week2["<b>GRAVITY</b><br/>Weeks 3-4: How Things Move"]
direction LR
L5["<b>L5: Kepler</b><br/>Empirical patterns"]
L6["<b>L6: Newton</b><br/>Physical explanation"]
end
subgraph week3["<b>LIGHT</b><br/>Weeks 4-5: What Light Tells Us"]
direction LR
L7["<b>L7: EM Spectrum</b><br/>Light as information"]
L8["<b>L8: Blackbody</b><br/>Temperature from color"]
L9["<b>L9: Lines</b><br/>Composition"]
L10["<b>L10: Doppler</b><br/>Motion from shifts"]
end
subgraph week4["<b>SYNTHESIS</b><br/>Week 6: Apply the Toolkit"]
direction LR
L11["<b>L11: Solar System</b><br/>All tools together"]
L12["<b>L12: Exoplanets</b><br/>Finding other worlds"]
L13["<b>L13: Life</b><br/>Drake Equation"]
end
L1 --> L2 --> L3 --> L4
L4 --> L5 --> L6
L6 --> L7 --> L8 --> L9 --> L10
L10 --> L11 --> L12 --> L13
style week1 fill:#dbeafe,stroke:#1e40af,stroke-width:2px
style week2 fill:#fed7aa,stroke:#c2410c,stroke-width:2px
style week3 fill:#bbf7d0,stroke:#15803d,stroke-width:2px
style week4 fill:#e9d5ff,stroke:#7e22ce,stroke-width:2px
The sequence isn’t arbitrary:
- Geometry first (L1-4) because it’s direct observation
- Gravity next (L5-6) because orbits reveal mass
- Light last (L7-10) because spectroscopy reveals everything else
- Capstone (L11-13) because now you can combine all tools
Kepler → Newton: Pattern to Explanation
The L5 → L6 transition illustrates how science works: observe patterns first, then find the physics that explains them.
flowchart LR
subgraph kepler["<b>KEPLER (L5)</b><br/><i>Described the patterns</i>"]
direction TB
K1["<b>Law 1:</b> Elliptical orbits<br/><i>What shape?</i>"]
K2["<b>Law 2:</b> Equal areas<br/><i>How does speed vary?</i>"]
K3["<b>Law 3:</b> P² ∝ a³<br/><i>How do period and distance relate?</i>"]
end
subgraph transition["<b>THE QUESTION</b>"]
Q["<b>WHY?</b><br/>What force causes<br/>these patterns?"]
end
subgraph newton["<b>NEWTON (L6)</b><br/><i>Explained the physics</i>"]
direction TB
N1["<b>Gravity:</b> F = GMm/r²<br/><i>Force law</i>"]
N2["<b>Centripetal:</b> F = mv²/r<br/><i>Orbital mechanics</i>"]
N3["<b>Newton-Kepler:</b> M = 4π²a³/GP²<br/><i>Mass from orbits!</i>"]
end
kepler --> transition --> newton
style kepler fill:#fef3c7,stroke:#b45309,stroke-width:2px
style transition fill:#fee2e2,stroke:#dc2626,stroke-width:2px
style newton fill:#dbeafe,stroke:#1e40af,stroke-width:2px
This is a common exam topic: “Explain the difference between Kepler’s empirical laws and Newton’s physical explanation.”
Kepler could predict where planets would be. Newton could explain why — and that explanation lets us measure mass.
The Light Lectures: One Phenomenon, Many Tools
L7-L10 show how starlight encodes multiple types of information.
flowchart TB
LIGHT["🌟 <b>STARLIGHT ARRIVES</b><br/>A single beam carries all this information"]
subgraph analysis["How we decode it"]
direction TB
subgraph L7box["<b>L7: What IS light?</b>"]
EM["Electromagnetic waves<br/>λ, ν, E relationships<br/>Full spectrum radio → γ"]
end
subgraph L8box["<b>L8: Continuous Spectrum</b>"]
BB["Blackbody radiation<br/><b>Wien:</b> T from peak λ<br/><b>Stefan-Boltzmann:</b> L from T, R"]
end
subgraph L9box["<b>L9: Discrete Lines</b>"]
SL["Absorption & emission<br/><b>Kirchhoff's Laws</b><br/>OBAFGKM sequence"]
end
subgraph L10box["<b>L10: Line Positions</b>"]
DOP["Wavelength shifts<br/><b>Doppler effect</b><br/>Δλ/λ = v/c"]
end
end
subgraph results["What we learn"]
direction TB
TEMP["🌡️ <b>Temperature</b>"]
LUM["💡 <b>Luminosity</b>"]
COMP["🧪 <b>Composition</b>"]
MOT["🚀 <b>Velocity</b>"]
end
LIGHT --> L7box
L7box --> L8box --> TEMP & LUM
L7box --> L9box --> COMP
L9box --> L10box --> MOT
style LIGHT fill:#fef08a,stroke:#ca8a04,stroke-width:2px
style L7box fill:#e0e7ff,stroke:#4338ca,stroke-width:1px
style L8box fill:#fef3c7,stroke:#b45309,stroke-width:1px
style L9box fill:#dcfce7,stroke:#15803d,stroke-width:1px
style L10box fill:#fce7f3,stroke:#be185d,stroke-width:1px
style results fill:#f0fdf4,stroke:#166534,stroke-width:2px
Capstone: Everything Connects
L11-L13 demonstrated that the toolkit works together. Here’s how each capstone lecture used multiple tools:
flowchart TB
subgraph tools["<b>YOUR TOOLKIT</b>"]
direction LR
T1["⚖️ <b>Newton</b><br/>Mass from orbits"]
T2["🌡️ <b>Wien</b><br/>T from peak λ"]
T3["🧪 <b>Spectroscopy</b><br/>Compositions"]
T4["🚀 <b>Doppler</b><br/>Velocities"]
end
subgraph L11box["<b>L11: Solar System</b><br/><i>Why is our solar system arranged this way?</i>"]
direction TB
SS1["Frost line → rocky vs. gas"]
SS2["Planet masses from moons"]
SS3["Compositions from spectra"]
end
subgraph L12box["<b>L12: Exoplanets</b><br/><i>How do we find planets around other stars?</i>"]
direction TB
EX1["<b>Transit:</b> R from depth"]
EX2["<b>RV:</b> M from wobble"]
EX3["Combined → density → rocky?"]
end
subgraph L13box["<b>L13: Are We Alone?</b><br/><i>What do we actually know?</i>"]
direction TB
DR1["Which Drake terms are known?"]
DR2["R★, fp, ne: constrained"]
DR3["fl, fi, fc, L: unknown"]
end
T1 --> SS2 & EX2
T2 --> SS3
T3 --> SS3
T4 --> EX2
SS1 & SS2 & SS3 --> L12box
L12box --> L13box
style tools fill:#f0fdf4,stroke:#166534,stroke-width:2px
style L11box fill:#dbeafe,stroke:#1e40af,stroke-width:2px
style L12box fill:#fed7aa,stroke:#c2410c,stroke-width:2px
style L13box fill:#e9d5ff,stroke:#7e22ce,stroke-width:2px
Quick Reference: Observable → Tool → Inference
| What You Observe | Which Tool | What You Learn | Key Equation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peak wavelength of spectrum | Wien’s Law | Temperature | \(T = b/\lambda_{peak}\) |
| Total brightness at known distance | Stefan-Boltzmann | Luminosity | \(L = 4\pi R^2 \sigma T^4\) |
| Brightness at unknown distance | Inverse-square law | Distance | \(F = L/4\pi d^2\) |
| Orbital period + distance | Kepler’s Third Law | Mass (of central object) | \(P^2 = 4\pi^2 a^3/GM\) |
| Absorption line wavelengths | Kirchhoff + atomic physics | Chemical composition | Line patterns = elemental fingerprints |
| Wavelength shift of lines | Doppler effect | Radial velocity | \(v = c \cdot \Delta\lambda/\lambda_0\) |
| Transit depth + RV amplitude | Combined methods | Density → rocky vs. gas | \(\rho = M/V\) |
Self-Test: Can You Trace the Logic?
For each inference below, trace backward through the diagram:
- “That star is 6000 K” — What did we observe? What model did we apply?
- “That planet has mass 0.5 M♃” — What observations were needed? What physics connects them?
- “That exoplanet is rocky” — What two methods were combined? What did each contribute?
If you can answer these without looking, you’ve mastered Module 1.
What’s Next?
In Module 2: Stars, we apply this same toolkit to understand stellar evolution:
- How stars are born (gravity + gas clouds → protostars)
- Why they shine (nuclear fusion in the core)
- How they evolve (main sequence → giants → endpoints)
- What determines their fate (mass is destiny!)
The Observable → Model → Inference framework continues — we’re just adding new physics.